Skip to main content
Log in/Register
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Search form

American Gaming Association

  • Industry Resources
    • Research
    • Video Library
    • Beyond The Casino Floor
    • State Information
    • FAQ
    • The Real Deal
    • Careers in Gaming
    • Third-Party Experts
    • Helpful Links
    • AGA CARD
  • Government Affairs
    • Priority Issues
    • Other Current Issues
    • Regulatory Reform
    • AGA Online Poker Headquarters
    • Industry Day in Washington
    • AGA PAC
    • Request Federal Issues Updates
  • Social Responsibility
    • All In Campaign Headquarters
    • Responsible Gaming
    • Diversity
  • Events and Programs
    • Global Gaming Expo
    • G2E Asia
    • G2E Webinar Series
    • Responsible Gaming Education Week
    • Industry Day in Washington
    • Gaming Hall of Fame
    • Communications Awards
    • Diverse Vendor of the Year Awards
    • Global Gaming Women
  • Newsroom
    • Latest News
    • Press Releases
    • Speeches and Testimony
    • Op-Eds
    • Letters to the Editor
    • AGA SmartBrief
    • Newsletters
  • About the AGA
    • Membership
    • Leadership
    • Annual Report
    • Contact Us

You are here

Home » Newsroom » Newsletters » Gaming Regulatory and Legal Update » Archives

Federal Court Halts Michigan Tribal Casino Development

Friday, March 22, 2013

In early March, a federal trial court issued a preliminary injunction against any effort by the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians to ask the federal government to take a parcel into trust for use as an off-reservation casino in Lansing, Michigan.  The state asked for the injunction while it seeks a court ruling that the tribe cannot proceed with an off-reservation casino without signing a revenue sharing agreement with the other federally-recognized Indian tribes in Michigan, as specified in a 1993 gaming compact between the tribe and the state.

District Judge Robert T. Jonker ruled first that the state attorney general’s lawsuit did not violate tribal sovereignty because the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) waived that sovereignty for such a tribal gaming dispute.  The court then concluded that the state’s interpretation of the tribal-state gaming compact was the “most plausible construction” of it and that the state would suffer irreparable harm if the proposed development proceeded.  State of Michigan v. The Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians, No. 1:12-CV-962 (W.D. Mich., March 5, 2013).

‹ States Crack Down On Internet Sweepstakes Cafes up Alabama Shuts Down VictoryLand, Again ›

In This Section

  • Latest News
  • Press Releases
  • Speeches and Testimony
  • Op-Eds
  • Letters to the Editor
  • AGA SmartBrief
  • Newsletters
    • Responsible Gaming Quarterly
    • Gaming Regulatory and Legal Update
      • Archives
    • Regulatory Reform Update

Affiliated Websites

Visit the NCRG Webiste

Visit the NCRG Website

Visit the G2E Website

The G2E Asia Website

Visit the G2E Asia Website

The Global Gaming Women Website

Visit the GGW Website

Find a Career in the Industry

Find a Career in the Industry

© 2013 American Gaming Association.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
  • Home