Skip to main content
Log in/Register
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Search form

American Gaming Association

  • Industry Resources
    • Research
    • Video Library
    • Beyond The Casino Floor
    • State Information
    • FAQ
    • The Real Deal
    • Careers in Gaming
    • Third-Party Experts
    • Helpful Links
    • AGA CARD
  • Government Affairs
    • Priority Issues
    • Other Current Issues
    • Regulatory Reform
    • AGA Online Poker Headquarters
    • Industry Day in Washington
    • AGA PAC
    • Request Federal Issues Updates
  • Social Responsibility
    • All In Campaign Headquarters
    • Responsible Gaming
    • Diversity
  • Events and Programs
    • Global Gaming Expo
    • G2E Asia
    • G2E Webinar Series
    • Responsible Gaming Education Week
    • Industry Day in Washington
    • Gaming Hall of Fame
    • Communications Awards
    • Diverse Vendor of the Year Awards
    • Global Gaming Women
  • Newsroom
    • Latest News
    • Press Releases
    • Speeches and Testimony
    • Op-Eds
    • Letters to the Editor
    • AGA SmartBrief
    • Newsletters
  • About the AGA
    • Membership
    • Leadership
    • Annual Report
    • Contact Us

You are here

Home » Newsroom » Newsletters » Gaming Regulatory and Legal Update » Archives

Settlement in Loto-Quebec Class Action: VLTs Do Not Cause Pathological Gambling

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

After almost a decade of litigation, including a trial that dragged on for more than a year, a settlement was reached in Brochu v. Loto-Quebec, a class action brought on behalf of gamblers at video lottery terminals (VLTs) in the Canadian province. The plaintiffs claimed that the VLTs were inherently addictive. The core terms of the deal, which still must be approved by the Quebec Superior Court, are:

  • The government entity that operates the VLTs in Quebec will pay the medical costs incurred by pathological gamblers in the province before 2002, when the provincial government began to pay those costs directly. Although the plaintiffs initially demanded 700 million Canadian dollars, published estimates placed the likely total at CA$50 million.
  • The stipulation of settlement states that VLTs are not the "cause of pathological gambling." With similar lawsuits pending in Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, and Ontario, that provision may be of considerable value to the defendants in those actions.

At one point in the lawsuit, the plaintiffs tried to sue the manufacturers of the VLTs, as well, but abandoned that strategy. Under Canadian law, the provincial government paid the plaintiffs' legal fees once the court certified the case as a class action. Those fees approached $CA3 million.

The Quebec court has scheduled a hearing in March, following notice of the settlement to all members of the plaintiff class, to decide whether to approve the settlement.

‹ Winter 2010 up British Court Rejects Kentucky Decree on Internet Gambling "Domain Names" ›

In This Section

  • Latest News
  • Press Releases
  • Speeches and Testimony
  • Op-Eds
  • Letters to the Editor
  • AGA SmartBrief
  • Newsletters
    • Responsible Gaming Quarterly
    • Gaming Regulatory and Legal Update
      • Archives
    • Regulatory Reform Update

Affiliated Websites

Visit the NCRG Webiste

Visit the NCRG Website

Visit the G2E Website

The G2E Asia Website

Visit the G2E Asia Website

The Global Gaming Women Website

Visit the GGW Website

Find a Career in the Industry

Find a Career in the Industry

© 2013 American Gaming Association.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
  • Home