Skip to main content
Log in/Register
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Search form

American Gaming Association

  • Industry Resources
    • Research
    • Video Library
    • Beyond The Casino Floor
    • State Information
    • FAQ
    • The Real Deal
    • Careers in Gaming
    • Third-Party Experts
    • Helpful Links
    • AGA CARD
  • Government Affairs
    • Priority Issues
    • Other Current Issues
    • Regulatory Reform
    • AGA Online Poker Headquarters
    • Industry Day in Washington
    • AGA PAC
    • Request Federal Issues Updates
  • Social Responsibility
    • All In Campaign Headquarters
    • Responsible Gaming
    • Diversity
  • Events and Programs
    • Global Gaming Expo
    • G2E Asia
    • G2E Webinar Series
    • Responsible Gaming Education Week
    • Industry Day in Washington
    • Gaming Hall of Fame
    • Communications Awards
    • Diverse Vendor of the Year Awards
    • Global Gaming Women
  • Newsroom
    • Latest News
    • Press Releases
    • Speeches and Testimony
    • Op-Eds
    • Letters to the Editor
    • AGA SmartBrief
    • Newsletters
  • About the AGA
    • Membership
    • Leadership
    • Annual Report
    • Contact Us

You are here

Home » Newsroom » Newsletters » Gaming Regulatory and Legal Update » Archives

Mirapex/Compulsive Gambling Suits Consolidated in Minnesota Federal Court

Monday, December 1, 2008

Minneapolis is now home for more than two hundred lawsuits from around the country alleging that the anti-Parkinson's drug Mirapex triggers compulsive gambling behaviors.  Those actions have been consolidated for discovery purposes before Chief Judge M. Rosenbaum of the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota.  In In re: Mirapex Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 07-1836 (JMR/FLN),  the plaintiffs cite studies by the Mayo Clinic and the Muhammad Ali Parkinson Research Center that report a higher incidence of compulsive gambling among people receiving doses of dopamine, the principal element of Mirapex.

In all of the cases, the defendants are the drug companies that developed and market Mirapex: Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, and Pharmacia & Upjohn.  The defendants won dismissal of most of the fraud and misrepresentation claims in the lawsuits, arguing that the plaintiffs failed to plead fraud with the specificity required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b).  The court did allow plaintiffs to proceed on a claim that the drug's sponsors deceived the Food and Drug Administration as to the consequences of taking Mirapex.

Discovery has proceeded on several "bellwether" individual claims, which will be used to crystallize the factual and legal questions in the litigation.  The drug company defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment under seal, which will be argued later this month.  If that motion is successful, the court would dispose of all the cases.

‹ Winter 2008 up Australians Search for Visible Cues of Problem Gambling ›

In This Section

  • Latest News
  • Press Releases
  • Speeches and Testimony
  • Op-Eds
  • Letters to the Editor
  • AGA SmartBrief
  • Newsletters
    • Responsible Gaming Quarterly
    • Gaming Regulatory and Legal Update
      • Archives
    • Regulatory Reform Update

Affiliated Websites

Visit the NCRG Webiste

Visit the NCRG Website

Visit the G2E Website

The G2E Asia Website

Visit the G2E Asia Website

The Global Gaming Women Website

Visit the GGW Website

Find a Career in the Industry

Find a Career in the Industry

© 2013 American Gaming Association.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
  • Home