Skip to main content
Log in/Register
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Search form

American Gaming Association

  • Industry Resources
    • Research
    • Video Library
    • Beyond The Casino Floor
    • State Information
    • FAQ
    • The Real Deal
    • Careers in Gaming
    • Third-Party Experts
    • Helpful Links
    • AGA CARD
  • Government Affairs
    • Priority Issues
    • Other Current Issues
    • Regulatory Reform
    • AGA Online Poker Headquarters
    • Industry Day in Washington
    • AGA PAC
    • Request Federal Issues Updates
  • Social Responsibility
    • All In Campaign Headquarters
    • Responsible Gaming
    • Diversity
  • Events and Programs
    • Global Gaming Expo
    • G2E Asia
    • G2E Webinar Series
    • Responsible Gaming Education Week
    • Industry Day in Washington
    • Gaming Hall of Fame
    • Communications Awards
    • Diverse Vendor of the Year Awards
    • Global Gaming Women
  • Newsroom
    • Latest News
    • Press Releases
    • Speeches and Testimony
    • Op-Eds
    • Letters to the Editor
    • AGA SmartBrief
    • Newsletters
  • About the AGA
    • Membership
    • Leadership
    • Annual Report
    • Contact Us

You are here

Home » Newsroom » Newsletters » Gaming Regulatory and Legal Update » Archives

Gambler Blames NJ Casino for Restoring Credit

Wednesday, June 1, 2005

In a series of six counterclaims filed in April, a New Jersey gambler accused The Borgata Resort and Casino of thwarting the state’s compulsive gambling policy by assisting him to reinstate his eligibility for credit. Marina District Development Co., L.L.C. v. Donald Carroll, No. ATL-L-1505-04(Atlantic County Super. Ct.). The gambler also denied any responsibility to repay the amounts the casino extended on his credit line.

According to his court filing, the gambler secured from the New Jersey Casino Control Commission “an indefinite suspension of his credit privileges.” While the plaintiff gambled at the The Borgata, a casino host there allegedly assured him of his “excellent credit,” and that by removing his name from the state’s voluntarily credit-privileges suspension list, “he would receive various goods and services on a complimentary basis.”  Supposedly, the casino then provided a limousine to transport the gambler to and from the state office so he could reverse the credit suspension.

The gambler claims The Borgata thereafter granted him $3,000 in goods and services, plus a $150,000 credit, and that he gambled and lost “most or all of the monies” at The Borgata’s casino. The counterclaims assert that the casino acted unconscionably and, contrary to the public policy of New Jersey, breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in the credit agreement, intentionally inflicting emotional distress on him.

The court case began when Borgata sued the gambler on the credit agreement and won a default judgment. The trial court vacated the default and allowed the gambler to file his counterclaims for compensatory and punitive damages.

‹ Aussie Class Action Claims Slots Harm Gamblers up Class Action Claims Parkinson’s Drug Causes Compulsive Gambling ›

In This Section

  • Latest News
  • Press Releases
  • Speeches and Testimony
  • Op-Eds
  • Letters to the Editor
  • AGA SmartBrief
  • Newsletters
    • Responsible Gaming Quarterly
    • Gaming Regulatory and Legal Update
      • Archives
    • Regulatory Reform Update

Affiliated Websites

Visit the NCRG Webiste

Visit the NCRG Website

Visit the G2E Website

The G2E Asia Website

Visit the G2E Asia Website

The Global Gaming Women Website

Visit the GGW Website

Find a Career in the Industry

Find a Career in the Industry

© 2013 American Gaming Association.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
  • Home