Skip to main content
Log in/Register
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Search form

American Gaming Association

  • Industry Resources
    • Research
    • Video Library
    • Beyond The Casino Floor
    • State Information
    • FAQ
    • The Real Deal
    • Careers in Gaming
    • Third-Party Experts
    • Helpful Links
    • AGA CARD
  • Government Affairs
    • Priority Issues
    • Other Current Issues
    • Regulatory Reform
    • AGA Online Poker Headquarters
    • Industry Day in Washington
    • AGA PAC
    • Request Federal Issues Updates
  • Social Responsibility
    • All In Campaign Headquarters
    • Responsible Gaming
    • Diversity
  • Events and Programs
    • Global Gaming Expo
    • G2E Asia
    • G2E Webinar Series
    • Responsible Gaming Education Week
    • Industry Day in Washington
    • Gaming Hall of Fame
    • Communications Awards
    • Diverse Vendor of the Year Awards
    • Global Gaming Women
  • Newsroom
    • Latest News
    • Press Releases
    • Speeches and Testimony
    • Op-Eds
    • Letters to the Editor
    • AGA SmartBrief
    • Newsletters
  • About the AGA
    • Membership
    • Leadership
    • Annual Report
    • Contact Us

You are here

Home » Newsroom » Newsletters » Gaming Regulatory and Legal Update » Archives

Canadian Court Rejects Compulsive Gambling Claim

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

The Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador ruled on December 12, 2008 that the Atlantic Lottery Corporation, which operates video lottery terminals (VLTs) in four provinces of eastern Canada, enjoys legal immunity against a class action lawsuit claiming that its gaming machines were "inherently deceptive, inherently addictive, and inherently dangerous." Estate of Susan Piercey v. Atlantic Lottery Corporation, No. 200701T1711CP.

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit are the parents of a woman who committed suicide in 2003 after losing $100,000 to VLTs over a 10-year period. The plaintiffs' lawyer vowed to refile the case asserting new claims under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the British Queen Anne's statute from the early 1700s. He insisted that the plaintiffs' goal is not a financial recovery, but the elimination of VLTs.

‹ Off-Reservation Restrictions in Wisconsin up

In This Section

  • Latest News
  • Press Releases
  • Speeches and Testimony
  • Op-Eds
  • Letters to the Editor
  • AGA SmartBrief
  • Newsletters
    • Responsible Gaming Quarterly
    • Gaming Regulatory and Legal Update
      • Archives
    • Regulatory Reform Update

Affiliated Websites

Visit the NCRG Webiste

Visit the NCRG Website

Visit the G2E Website

The G2E Asia Website

Visit the G2E Asia Website

The Global Gaming Women Website

Visit the GGW Website

Find a Career in the Industry

Find a Career in the Industry

© 2013 American Gaming Association.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
  • Home