Skip to main content
Log in/Register
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Search form

American Gaming Association

  • Industry Resources
    • Research
    • Video Library
    • Beyond The Casino Floor
    • State Information
    • FAQ
    • The Real Deal
    • Careers in Gaming
    • Third-Party Experts
    • Helpful Links
    • AGA CARD
  • Government Affairs
    • Priority Issues
    • Other Current Issues
    • Regulatory Reform
    • AGA Online Poker Headquarters
    • Industry Day in Washington
    • AGA PAC
    • Request Federal Issues Updates
  • Social Responsibility
    • All In Campaign Headquarters
    • Responsible Gaming
    • Diversity
  • Events and Programs
    • Global Gaming Expo
    • G2E Asia
    • G2E Webinar Series
    • Responsible Gaming Education Week
    • Industry Day in Washington
    • Gaming Hall of Fame
    • Communications Awards
    • Diverse Vendor of the Year Awards
    • Global Gaming Women
  • Newsroom
    • Latest News
    • Press Releases
    • Speeches and Testimony
    • Op-Eds
    • Letters to the Editor
    • AGA SmartBrief
    • Newsletters
  • About the AGA
    • Membership
    • Leadership
    • Annual Report
    • Contact Us

You are here

Home » Newsroom » Newsletters » Gaming Regulatory and Legal Update » Archives

Aussie Class Action Claims Slots Harm Gamblers

Wednesday, June 1, 2005

In mid-June, a consumer class action was filed in New South Wales (Australia) Federal Court alleging that gaming machines are wrongfully harming the health and finances of Australian gamblers. Respondents named in the lawsuit include Aristocrat, IGT, Lasseters, Sky City, Tabcorp, Tattersalls and seven Australian state governments.O’Shanassy v. Ainsworth Game Technologies Pty. Limited, et al., No. NSD 966/20005 (New South Wales Fed. Ct.). The suit also named as defendants the Australian Hotels Association and the Australian Casino Association.

Although the suit is in its very early stages, an initial submission by the plaintiff alleges that gaming machines in Australia misrepresent themselves as “games of chance as distinct from computer-programmed outcomes” and are inherently dangerous products.  The submission also charges the respondents with negligent failure to warn gamblers of the harms posed by these machines.

The plaintiff is seeking initial discovery from all respondents concerning the operational results of gaming machines and their “harm and social impact.”

‹ Summer 2005 up Gambler Blames NJ Casino for Restoring Credit ›

In This Section

  • Latest News
  • Press Releases
  • Speeches and Testimony
  • Op-Eds
  • Letters to the Editor
  • AGA SmartBrief
  • Newsletters
    • Responsible Gaming Quarterly
    • Gaming Regulatory and Legal Update
      • Archives
    • Regulatory Reform Update

Affiliated Websites

Visit the NCRG Webiste

Visit the NCRG Website

Visit the G2E Website

The G2E Asia Website

Visit the G2E Asia Website

The Global Gaming Women Website

Visit the GGW Website

Find a Career in the Industry

Find a Career in the Industry

© 2013 American Gaming Association.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
  • Home