Skip to main content
Log in/Register
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Search form

American Gaming Association

  • Industry Resources
    • Research
    • Video Library
    • Beyond The Casino Floor
    • State Information
    • FAQ
    • The Real Deal
    • Careers in Gaming
    • Third-Party Experts
    • Helpful Links
    • AGA CARD
  • Government Affairs
    • Priority Issues
    • Other Current Issues
    • Regulatory Reform
    • AGA Online Poker Headquarters
    • Industry Day in Washington
    • AGA PAC
    • Request Federal Issues Updates
  • Social Responsibility
    • All In Campaign Headquarters
    • Responsible Gaming
    • Diversity
  • Events and Programs
    • Global Gaming Expo
    • G2E Asia
    • G2E Webinar Series
    • Responsible Gaming Education Week
    • Industry Day in Washington
    • Gaming Hall of Fame
    • Communications Awards
    • Diverse Vendor of the Year Awards
    • Global Gaming Women
  • Newsroom
    • Latest News
    • Press Releases
    • Speeches and Testimony
    • Op-Eds
    • Letters to the Editor
    • AGA SmartBrief
    • Newsletters
  • About the AGA
    • Membership
    • Leadership
    • Annual Report
    • Contact Us

You are here

Home » Newsroom » Newsletters » Gaming Regulatory and Legal Update » Archives

Appeals Court Dismisses Claim by Gambler’s Spouse

Monday, March 1, 2004

 

In a procedural ruling announced in early March, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit dismissed an appeal by the spouse of an alleged compulsive gambler who sought to exclude the gambler from an Indiana casino.  In Brown v. Argosy Gaming Co., L.P. (No. 03-1280), the court ruled that the spouse had not appealed a final judgment so there was nothing for the court to decide.

Johnnie Brown alleged that Argosy Casino & Hotel in Lawrenceburg, Ind., negligently failed to honor her request to bar her husband from gambling. The complaint said his gambling losses caused utility bills to go unpaid and worsened her health. The trial court denied Brown's request for a preliminary injunction and dismissed the case without prejudice to trying an amended complaint.      

Despite contradictory statements in other appellate papers filed, Brown’s brief asked only that the federal court certify to the Indiana Supreme Court the question of whether she had a cause of action for negligent failure to exclude her spouse. That issue cannot be appealed, according to Judge Ilana Rovner, who wrote for the unanimous federal panel. Brown had not appealed the denial of her preliminary injunction request, which was appealable. Finally, since the trial court had dismissed the complaint without prejudice, that ruling also was not final for appeal purposes.

‹ Austrian Compulsive Gambler Wins Lawsuit up

In This Section

  • Latest News
  • Press Releases
  • Speeches and Testimony
  • Op-Eds
  • Letters to the Editor
  • AGA SmartBrief
  • Newsletters
    • Responsible Gaming Quarterly
    • Gaming Regulatory and Legal Update
      • Archives
    • Regulatory Reform Update

Affiliated Websites

Visit the NCRG Webiste

Visit the NCRG Website

Visit the G2E Website

The G2E Asia Website

Visit the G2E Asia Website

The Global Gaming Women Website

Visit the GGW Website

Find a Career in the Industry

Find a Career in the Industry

© 2013 American Gaming Association.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
  • Home