Baltimore Sun

Dear Editor:

I was deeply troubled to read Sunday’s editorial, “Slots-parlor odds favor losses and tedium.” At best, author Jay Hancock failed to check the facts; at worst, he deliberately misled his readers.

The gaming industry makes no secret about the odds associated with casino games. Had Mr. Hancock read the American Gaming Association’s “Understanding the Odds” brochure more carefully, he would have realized that slot machine odds are, in fact, listed quite clearly.

As stated in the brochure – and confirmed by Hollywood Casino representatives – slot machines keep between $2.50 and $12 of every $100 wagered. In his editorial, Mr. Hancock cited the odds associated with video poker, which is an entirely different game. It seems that Mr. Hancock’s reporting – not the gaming industry’s educational materials – is deceptive.

I also take issue with the “victim” label Mr. Hancock applies to those who enjoy casino gambling. More than a quarter of the U.S. adult population – 61.7 million Americans – visited a casino in 2009. I am quite certain that the vast majority of those individuals do not consider themselves victims.

Moreover, the cost of visiting to a casino is comparable to the expenses associated with attending a play, ballgame or concert. In fact, almost half (48 percent) of casino patrons set budgets of less than $100 for their casino visits in 2009.

I strongly urge The Sun to print a correction to Sunday’s editorial. The gaming industry didn’t get the facts wrong – Mr. Hancock did.

Sincerely,

Frank J. Fahrenkopf Jr.
President and CEO
American Gaming Association